<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anthropologists on Web 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technotaste.com/blog/anthropologists-on-web-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technotaste.com/blog/anthropologists-on-web-20/</link>
	<description>Social Psychology, Anthropology, Technology, Gluttony - by Judd Antin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:57:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Erickson</title>
		<link>http://www.technotaste.com/blog/anthropologists-on-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-15625</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Erickson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 20:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technotaste.com/blog/anthropologists-on-web-20/#comment-15625</guid>
		<description>As usual, I preach what I need to hear, but a couple things bug me about that whole discussion.

First, anthropologists are too dismissive of contemporary and non-anthropological discussions of new tech.  That bugs me.  Second, anthropologists these days do a shitty job relating what they have learned,  about technology and change in  other times and places to issues of change and tech today.  No one mentioned arcaeological work about tech and change (there&#039;s a huge literature here); no one mentioned irrigation systems and their relationship to political systems (water, like information in a fiber cable, flows and can be shut off at the source and re-directed, resulting in dry fields, conflict, and interesting forms of social organization, depending).  

Funny: I stumbled on this blog because I was looking around for stuff about collaboration and ethnography for a project on automobility.  Didn&#039;t expect to see a link to our website!  Thanks for that.

_ken_</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As usual, I preach what I need to hear, but a couple things bug me about that whole discussion.</p>
<p>First, anthropologists are too dismissive of contemporary and non-anthropological discussions of new tech.  That bugs me.  Second, anthropologists these days do a shitty job relating what they have learned,  about technology and change in  other times and places to issues of change and tech today.  No one mentioned arcaeological work about tech and change (there&#039;s a huge literature here); no one mentioned irrigation systems and their relationship to political systems (water, like information in a fiber cable, flows and can be shut off at the source and re-directed, resulting in dry fields, conflict, and interesting forms of social organization, depending).  </p>
<p>Funny: I stumbled on this blog because I was looking around for stuff about collaboration and ethnography for a project on automobility.  Didn&#039;t expect to see a link to our website!  Thanks for that.</p>
<p>_ken_</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: University Update</title>
		<link>http://www.technotaste.com/blog/anthropologists-on-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-14329</link>
		<dc:creator>University Update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 19:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technotaste.com/blog/anthropologists-on-web-20/#comment-14329</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Anthropologists on Web 2.0...&lt;/strong&gt;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Anthropologists on Web 2.0&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
