From the NYTimes: Senators Assert Right to Block Bush on Iraq
The problem with the argument that going against President Bush now by trying to cut-off funding or prevent additional troops from going to Iraq is that one could make that argument about any decision once it's been made. The decisions become self-fulfilling prophesies if we believe that once they've been announced, contradicting them would 'send the wrong message.'
If there is a logical, reasonable argument in favor of sending more troops to Iraq (other than those that President Bush has already tried to make), let's hear them. But the message I'd love for the world to get from a constitutional challenge to Bush's insane bent on war is this:
Democracy in the US is starting to work again.